Scope
We design and execute targeted tests for misuse pathways, safety bypasses, autonomy escalation, and operational edge cases. Engagements combine prompt-level testing, tool-augmented evaluation, workflow review, and escalation-path analysis.
Service
Adversarial Evaluation
Adversarial testing for frontier models, agentic systems, and deployment workflows.
What we do
Deliverables
- Threat model and test plan
- Annotated findings with severity and confidence
- Reproducible test artifacts and evidence logs
- Mitigation priorities mapped to controls
Engagement structure
Week 1
Scope and threat model
Weeks 2-4
Testing and analysis
Week 5
Findings and remediation
When to engage us
You are preparing a high-impact deployment
Independent testing can identify failure modes before launch or external review.
You need an external check on internal safety claims
We pressure-test assumptions and turn findings into decision-ready evidence.
Agentic behavior is expanding
Tool use, memory, autonomy, and delegation require escalation-specific evaluation.
A board, regulator, or partner needs reviewable evidence
We provide clear artifacts that support oversight and remediation planning.
Related services
Organizations that engage us for red teaming often also need governance controls.
Adversarial findings become more useful when tied to decision rights, escalation triggers, and operating procedures.
Evaluation package
Threat model, test matrix, evidence log, severity-ranked mitigation backlog, and a replayable summary for technical leads.
FAQ
Yes. NDA workflows are standard and can be completed before technical details are shared.
We can work from API, product, staging, or documented workflow access depending on scope and sensitivity.
Yes. Findings include evidence logs, assumptions, severity, and reproduction guidance where safe to disclose.
Request an evaluation.
We can scope a targeted test design for your system.
Schedule consultation →